layout: page title: Assessment permalink: /assessment/ —

Overview

This module uses 8 assessment components totalling 100%.

Components

ID Title Type Mode Weight Due Week Delivery
Q1 In-Class Quiz 1: Probability and Entropy Foundations in-class-quiz summative 10% 2 in-class
W1 Worksheet 1: Socratic Dialogue on the History of Entropy mini-project summative 15% 2 take-home
Q2 In-Class Quiz 2: Ensemble, Helmholtz, Shannon H and Boltzmann S in-class-quiz summative 10% 4 in-class
W2 Worksheet 2: Socratic Dialogue on Shannon H and Boltzmann S mini-project summative 15% 4 take-home
Q3 In-Class Quiz 3: Grouping, Maxwell’s Demon, and MaxEnt in-class-quiz summative 10% 6 in-class
W3 Worksheet 3: Socratic Dialogue on Coarse-Graining Maxwell mini-project summative 15% 6 take-home
Q4 In-Class Quiz 4: Multi-Information, I+H=C, Von Neumann Entropy, Limits on Intelligence in-class-quiz summative 10% 8 in-class
W4 Worksheet 4: Multi-Information, Von Neumann Entropy, and Limits on Intelligence mini-project summative 15% 8 take-home

Component Details

Q1: In-Class Quiz 1: Probability and Entropy Foundations

Type: in-class-quiz | Weight: 10% | Due week: 2 | Delivery: in-class Estimated workload: 0.2h AI robustness: Invigilated in-class test on Moodle. Random draw from a large bank reduces repeatability. No external resources.

W1: Worksheet 1: Socratic Dialogue on the History of Entropy

Type: mini-project | Weight: 15% | Due week: 2 | Delivery: take-home Estimated workload: 3.0h AI robustness: Students must pose curiosity and skepticism prompts as Socrates in exactly ten turns from one continuous conversation with a single LLM (model name and version declared); planning may use any tools, but only the final exchange is submitted. The reflection is handwritten on a scanned proforma. Authenticity is further verified by the paired in-class Quiz 1 (Week 2).

Q2: In-Class Quiz 2: Ensemble, Helmholtz, Shannon H and Boltzmann S

Type: in-class-quiz | Weight: 10% | Due week: 4 | Delivery: in-class Estimated workload: 0.2h AI robustness: Invigilated in-class paper test. No external resources. This sitting is paper (as Quiz 1); the yaml bank is not this sitting.

W2: Worksheet 2: Socratic Dialogue on Shannon H and Boltzmann S

Type: mini-project | Weight: 15% | Due week: 4 | Delivery: take-home Estimated workload: 3.0h AI robustness: Students must pose curiosity and skepticism prompts as Socrates in exactly ten turns from one continuous conversation with a single LLM (model name and version declared); planning may use any tools, but only the final exchange is submitted. The reflection is handwritten on a scanned proforma. Related material is checked under invigilated Quiz 2 (Week 4).

Q3: In-Class Quiz 3: Grouping, Maxwell’s Demon, and MaxEnt

Type: in-class-quiz | Weight: 10% | Due week: 6 | Delivery: in-class Estimated workload: 0.2h AI robustness: Invigilated in-class test on Moodle. No external resources. This sitting covers Weeks 4–5 as delivered; the yaml bank path is leftover Moodle scaffolding and is not this sitting.

W3: Worksheet 3: Socratic Dialogue on Coarse-Graining Maxwell

Type: mini-project | Weight: 15% | Due week: 6 | Delivery: take-home Estimated workload: 3.0h AI robustness: Students must pose curiosity and skepticism prompts as Socrates in exactly ten turns from one continuous conversation with a single LLM (model name and version declared); planning may use any tools, but only the final exchange is submitted. The reflection is handwritten on a scanned proforma.

Q4: In-Class Quiz 4: Multi-Information, I+H=C, Von Neumann Entropy, Limits on Intelligence

Type: in-class-quiz | Weight: 10% | Due week: 8 | Delivery: in-class Estimated workload: 0.2h AI robustness: Invigilated in-class test on Moodle. Random draw from a large bank. No external resources.

W4: Worksheet 4: Multi-Information, Von Neumann Entropy, and Limits on Intelligence

Type: mini-project | Weight: 15% | Due week: 8 | Delivery: take-home Estimated workload: 3.0h AI robustness: LLMs permitted. Authenticity verified by in-class Quiz 4 (Week 8), applying multi-information and the perpetual motion analogy to a new example under invigilated conditions.